The Shootings And Death At Columbine High School in Colorado

While this may abide g one and only(a) un-remarked by Ameri discounts who are use to such all-encompassing coverage of events even this strikingly violent in nature, the dispute in coverage of the events in the united States and abroad backside highlight differing cultural attitudes between the United States and other countries.

This musical composition examines one such set of differences, those between coverage of the events in the United States and in Saudi-Arabian Arabia. Of course, there was a spacious deal to a greater extent coverage of Columbine in the United States, as there allow for always be more coverage of an event the closer that one gets to the place where it occurred. in that respect is nothing surprising or even terribly remarkable somewhat this and so it shall not be a snap of this paper. Instead, the differing content of the coverage in the two countries shall be examined.

Saudi Arabia, being a smaller countrified than the United States, has distant fewer newspapers, only about a dozen (including several(prenominal) in English) compared to the hundreds of newspapers in the United States. The United States has newspapers published in a variety of languages to reflect the great diversity of this country of immigrants.

In Saudi Arabia, the government operates radio and television beam services, with several million radios and television receivers in use and strong over 1 million telephones, meaning that many Saudis at a time have access to foreign media coverage of ev

To understand the place of the media within Saudi Arabia one must first understand a little about the overall political structure of the country. Saudi Arabia is a monarchy with a government based on the Sharia, the sacred law of Islam, which is see according to the strict Hanbali rite by the learned phantasmal elders, or ulama. Saudi Arabia had no written constitution until environ 1992, when a series of royal decrees established a board of rights, increased the powers of provincial governments, and provided for a 60-member Consultative Council, to be decreed by the king (Wiley, 1999, p. 28).

It should be noted that even in the United States freedom of the fight back is not absolute.

The principle has spacious been established that the press may not be used in circumstances that would create a "clear and enter danger" of bringing about serious consequences to some solid interest that the government has a right or craft to protect. During World War I, for example, restrictions were placed on the direct advocacy of treason and on criticism of the government, conscription, or the American tholepin (Walachow, 1994. P. 41).

Another important limit on the free press is the law of backbite, involving the defamation of a person, glum accusations, or film of someone to hatred, ridicule, or pecuniary loss. In 1964 the Supreme approach weighed the libel law against the interests protected by the 1st Amendment. The homage held that a public figure who sues a newspaper for libel can recover damages only if the person can prove that the statement printed was made with actual malice, that is, "with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard of whether it was false or not."

Walachow, W. (1994). take over expression: International essays in law and philosophy. New York: capital of South Carolina University.

If you begin with a society like Saudi Arabia that is comparatively homogeneous and governed by the tenets of a single religion, then you will have a press that is a quasi-govern
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.