Untitled

TO: ERIK BAUM BY: BORJAFRAILE Created by pepe sa Sex in the Net!         A social and ethical es theorise task, designed to show students with a Broader insight into both the lucre and computer ethics.         Since the beginning of time, custody and women hasten fantasised everyplace tender bodies. obscenity has always been a assort of bread and butter and yet it has n forever been so right away available as what it is now. titillating stories, explicit pictures, XXX- rated films and modern solar daytime magazines, ar solely type of the stimulus corporeal which is cognize as soot or as it is legally put, obscenity. Is it ethically right for our children to be feeling at this erotic material at such(prenominal) an early while? Do we drop a wriggle sense of morals if we support vulgarism? Or is it exclusively a natural part of life that should be nurtured and further?         These school principals and more be springing to peoples lips as we immortalize the expert age. The age of the internet. Never before has smut fungus been so right away available. Through mail-order, at secret places around the schoolyard, or hardly down at the local untestedsagent or mental picture store, pornography net be purchased in some(prenominal) form or media. I know children, some as young as ten years, who have an unlimited planning of pornography. They have been loose to it from an early age and it has become an dependence like sess or drinking. Part of the line of work is that ostracizeship laws atomic number 18 non enforced. close to newsagents bequeath sell a twelve year old, pornography, (legal age of 18) but will not sell them a softwargon adoptage of cig arttes (legal age of 16 until June 1994). The provable derivative from this claimment, is that fines and punishments for selling pornography to underage souls, be not high enough. So wherefore dont we raise t hem? The answer to this question can be en! graft on the screen of both computer in the world. The network, or as one person put it, The closest involvement to true anarchy that has ever existed.         How is one to criminalize the Internet when it is literally undoable? What is the consumption of placing fines for copying pornography when it is unattainable to tell the age of the user. How can one even keep up the user when there argon twenty-five billion members and it is impossible to follow them all. How can we scratch the pornography when a new batch arrives every day and it is impossible to stop it.          other chief which makes security review rocky is the fact that censorship laws have just recently world needful. In England for instance, censorship laws have, for hundreds of years, concentrated on heretic materials, where as now, they are finding that the only(prenominal) offence censorship is contest to prevent, is pornography. The US excessively postula te to put strict censorship on all odious material, however the first amendment of their piece of music enjoins that, their shall be no law abridging the freedom of speech or press, and so they are finding it difficult to step around, the law.         It is explicit that people are putting an effort in to censor the pornography, however when it comes to criminalize material which goes all over the world, a balance moldiness be put up among the censorship laws of all the countries that are hooked into the net. Here a problem arises, because Denmark has no censorship of pornography, so obviously they are leaving to be middling annoyed if it is banned from the Internet since their laws state that it is perfectly legal. So an line of products occurs. How is the world to censor the Internet without causing discrepancies between the different countries? Indeed, some people say, wherefore bother?         So far, you have seen that there would b e a great obstruction involved in censoring the Inte! rnet. So the other locating of the blood, presented by the economists and pornography fanatics, is that, why should we censor the Internet when perchance it is not needed. There are umteen people in the world who will tell you that pornography is a virtuous part of life. Artists will tell you that the stark naked body is a picture of beauty, grace and style. Authorities in Denmark will say that pornography is a valued part of their society and psychologists will tell you that pornography reduces the rate of internal abuse and rape. Indeed, the humanity body is a natural part of life in all of its forms, so why do we regard the naked body as been obscene. Is it not stated in the leger that knowledge told us to where clothes? And did it not too state that god did not hope us to have wisdom? So can it not also be said, that God did not want us to put one over clothes and so therefore, he was encouraging pornography?

This purpose seems to demolish the religious fanatics who say that we will burn in hell for flavour at obscene materials.         After face at both sides of the argument, it is obvious to see that some centerfield point mustiness be reached between the two. Pornography on the Internet cannot be totally band and yet it cannot be accessed by whatsoever user as our societys ethics are against children looking at pornography. A set of ethics or laws must be devised that will satisfy each and every acres which is on the Internet. It must be devised by a giving medication party such as the United Nations, or by a committee which has representatives from each country.         My evaluation of the argu ment and my recommendations are as follows, Pornograp! hy which is stored on the Internet must be placed in an area which can be accessed only by a password, as well as identification which proves that the user is over eighteen. (eg A drivers license number.) Pornography which is found on public bulletin boards must be deleted immediately. This is the tariff of not only the governing committee, but also the user. Files which are identified as pornography are to be traced and any under eighteen users are to be fined accordingly. viewing earreach of pornography who are over eighteen are to stay strictly confidential. No personal data is to be released unless it is mandatory for National Security ecetera.         The above recommendations, if carried out on the Internet, would stand the world with a pornography-safe network, one that could be used by children and adults alike across the globe. Bibliography 1)         The Electronic Encyclopedia, Grolier Electronic Publishing, Inc, 1990 2)         Times Magazine, pack Button, December 13th, 1993 3) Times Magazine, Philip Elmer-Dewitt, July 25th, 1994 4) Pornography and Silence, Susan Griffin, 1981 5)         Literature, Obcenity and the Law, Felix Lewis, 1976 6) The End of Obscenity, Charles Rembar, 1968 7) Pornography, Obscenity and the Law, Lester Sobel, 1978 If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.