Case Study

[Institution][Course][Subject]Case StudyPrepare for[Name of Professor]Prepared by[Name of Author]Student ID : []Semester /YearCase Study1 .Deana was unable to fulfill the employment as an broker to Worf in Knapp 381 by disobeying her booster cable s instruction regarding the confidentiality of his plan to make up his solicitation through her chatting with the sellers . She also violated 1All ER 129 by impuissance her duty to act in the flesh(predicate)ly because of sending her help on Worf s behalf . Deanna also violated 1 Ch 766 because she fails to do her duty as an broker not to make secret lettuce by intending to sell her collection to add to Worf s collection with an surplus evaluate of 30Deanna also decided to place the money that Worf gave her into her proclaim notice that violates an promoter s duty to keep his o r her personal proportion from that of the important (specific law not stated , parachute 15 Because of Deanna s actions , Worf may terminate his constrict with Deanna and puddle an unalike agent to the job . However , due to the pronouncement that Worf gave Deanna , it would be weighed down to terminate the transaction Deanna made with Riker since the action was to meliorate the winemaker of Worf2 .Regarding the contract made by Geordie in Worf s behalf , it nookie be said that Geordie s action , making a contract that exceeds the keep instruction by Worf , was not covered by her occurrenceual laterality given by Worf , thus , Worf was not average to the contract that Geordie made with the Data . She also failed to act for the mavin s best interest which an agent s duty (specific law not stated , slide 14 . Data on the diametrical hand may have another transaction with Worf upon the hindrance of their previous contract with Geordie . Geordie also violated the duty of an agent not to make secret profits ! .

Worf may mesh on Geordie for her actions and for violating the agency law to recover the damage brought to her . On the other hand , the precisely thing that Geordie can do is to bring for Worf s forgiveness because she was the one at fault and some(prenominal) charges against her only result in her defeat 3 (a ) In the typeface of Worf and Picard , Worf cannot implement the contract against Picard since the liability of the transaction is low Beverly s articulatio humeri because she was responsible to Picard by acting outside the unfeigned imprimatur (Cases for Ratification ) and placing her own interest over that of her principal (b ) non telling the name of her principal doe s not deny the situation that Beverly acted outside her actual authority (Cases for Ratification Thus , Worf add still be unable to follow out the contract with Picard (c ) No . Worf will still not be able to enforce the contract with Picard unless Picard ratifies Beverly s actions (d ) By acting outside her actual authority and the inability to fulfill the duty of an agent to the...If you want to nail a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay