Before we can tell the justifiability of the taken means, we are supposed to define the word-worthy: which thing is worthy? What goal can be called worthy? How do you know whether a goal is worthy or not? In my observation, worth is a concept not only subjective still also abstract, which means that whether a goal is worthy for the most part depends on the world view, the sense of value, even the custom and habits of that actor who is devoted to his/her goal. It is much easy to image the totally divergent points of view between an Indian and a Chinese low the same situation or handling the same affair. The priming coat to it is obvious owing to the different sense of values they hold. They nourish different history. They possess different culture. They own different habits. In this way, how could they share the same values when coming to an identical goal?

So since the worthiness of a goal confined by numerous conditions is hard to be identified, let alone the justifiability of the means taken to attain it.
Further to a greater extent, granted that the majority of kind-hearted beings have the same attitude towards right and wrong on with the fusion of culture and the globalization of economy. It is still presumptuous to pronounce that any means to a goal is justifiable. Just desire what the famous proverb says--All roads lead to Rome, also in that location are many roads leading to success. However, not all road is the same. It is undeniable that maybe some is rougher than another, or possibly some is more direct than another. In a more direct way to a worthy goal, is it still justifiable when the short cut is illegitimate? I doubt it...If you take to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment